The company
Who We Are
We specialize in developing enterprise software solutions for the healthcare industry. That has been true since the beginning, and it is still true. What has changed is how the software gets built.
There is no sales team behind this page. Write to contact@wecsharp.com and the person accountable for the engineering reads it.
Where we come from
The short version
WeCSharp was built around one kind of work: enterprise systems for organizations where getting it wrong has consequences. Healthcare providers, life sciences teams, and the people who run clinical trials.
That work teaches a particular discipline. Requirements arrive as protocols and standard operating procedures, not user stories. "Finished" means validated, not merely deployed. Every record needs an owner, a timestamp, and a reason. Data has residency rules and access boundaries that are not negotiable. You learn to design for the reviewer who will read your system two years from now.
Our team understands the unique needs and challenges of the healthcare industry, and we have spent years delivering custom software that addresses them. What changed recently is the implementation, not the standard: agents now carry most of the code, and you can read how we build today.
What we know
Domain depth
Healthcare software fails in domain-specific ways. Most of those failures are not coding errors — they are misunderstandings of what the process actually requires.
-
Clinical trials
Protocol-driven workflow, study and site setup, subject data, monitoring, deviations, and the reporting that has to reconcile across all of it.
-
Regulated records
Audit trails, electronic signatures, versioning, retention, and access control designed to meet 21 CFR Part 11 expectations rather than approximate them.
-
Health data handling
HIPAA-governed information treated with the segregation, minimization, and logging it requires, from the first line of schema design.
-
Enterprise integration
Making a new system live alongside the EDC, CTMS, document management, identity, and finance platforms that are already in place and are not going anywhere.
How the practice changed
From writing software to directing it
The economics of building software changed. We changed with them, deliberately.
Our delivery now runs on AI — coding agents for implementation, custom agents we build into client systems, and a language model where a product needs one. Agents write most of the code, the tests, the migrations, and the documentation. Our engineers do the work that actually determines whether a system is any good: the architecture, the domain model, the constraints, the acceptance criteria, the review, and the sign-off.
This is not a pivot away from what we did before. It is the reason the work that came before it matters. An agent will build precisely what it is asked to build, quickly and tirelessly. Knowing what to ask for in a validated clinical environment is the part that takes a long apprenticeship, and that is the part we bring.
The result is smaller teams, shorter timelines, consistent quality gates applied to every change, and a complete, auditable history of how a system came to be the way it is. In regulated work, that last one is not a nice-to-have.
-
Where we started
A C# and .NET consultancy
Built around enterprise systems for organizations where getting it wrong has consequences.
-
What we specialized in
Healthcare and clinical trials
Enterprise applications, Azure environments and SharePoint estates, built for operations that get inspected.
-
Today
Agentic delivery
The same engineering standards and the same gates, with AI coding agents carrying the implementation.
Accountability
The principal
One named person is accountable for the engineering on every engagement, and it is the same person you talk to on the first call.
Shivaji Thakkallapelly
Principal
He is the only named person on this site, and that is deliberate. Naming one accountable engineer is more useful to you than a page of headshots, because it tells you exactly whose judgement you are buying.
- System architecture. The domain model, the boundaries and the data-handling rules.
- Acceptance criteria. What "done" means, written down before implementation starts.
- Review. Every change is read by a person, whoever or whatever wrote it.
- Release sign-off. Recorded against a named person, on every release.
Principles
How we work
Six things we hold to on every engagement, whether it is a two-week slice or a multi-year platform.
-
Correctness before cleverness
In this domain, an elegant solution that is wrong in an edge case is simply wrong. We optimize for systems that behave predictably under conditions nobody anticipated.
-
Write it down
Architecture decisions, trade-offs, rejected options and known limitations are recorded as we go, because the person who needs that reasoning is usually not in the room and usually arrives later.
-
The gate is the same for everyone
Code written by an agent goes through the same review, the same tests and the same acceptance criteria as code written by a person. The standard is set by the requirement, not by the author.
-
The smallest system that works
Every component added is a component that must be maintained, secured, patched and eventually validated. We add them reluctantly and remove them gladly.
-
You own everything
Source, tests, infrastructure definitions, pipelines and documentation live in your accounts and repositories from the first commit, so continuing without us is always a live option.
-
Say what we do not know
Estimates come with their assumptions attached, and when something is uncertain we say so rather than discovering it together three months in.
The team
A small senior practice
WeCSharp is a small, senior practice. That is a deliberate structure, not a stage we are trying to grow out of.
Agentic delivery rewards small teams of experienced engineers. The work that remains for humans — architecture, domain judgment, constraint-setting, review — is precisely the work that does not scale by adding junior headcount. So we do not. When you engage us, you work directly with the people making the technical decisions. There is no bench, no handoff to a delivery team you have not met, and no account manager relaying your requirements to someone else.
We take on work we are equipped to do well, and we say so when a project needs something we are not.
- Remote-first by design. Overlap hours are agreed at kickoff and held to, with a written handover at the end of each working day.
- Decisions are written, not remembered. A review does not depend on who happened to be awake for the conversation.
- Data residency is a decision. Where code, data and logs live is agreed before work begins, not discovered afterwards.
- No office address on this site. There is no reception to visit, so we do not publish one to imply otherwise.
Boundaries
What we don't do
Work with us directly
Describe the problem in a few sentences — the outcome you need, the constraints you are under, and who has to sign it off. We will tell you how we would approach it, and whether we are the right people for it.
Or email contact@wecsharp.com. A senior engineer reads every message.