Contact
Contact Us
Tell us what you are trying to build, or what is currently not working. A senior engineer reads every message that reaches us — not a sales team, and not an autoresponder.
Early-stage and vague is fine; some of the best engagements start with a paragraph describing a mess. There is no sales sequence behind this page and no tracking on it. If the form is in your way, write straight to contact@wecsharp.com.
Send a message
Send us a message
A few details and a few sentences are enough to start. Nothing here is shared with anyone else, and there is no mailing list to be added to.
Send it by email instead
Nothing you typed has been lost. Your message is written out below, ready to send from your own mail client — or select it, copy it, and paste it into an email to contact@wecsharp.com.
Always works
Prefer plain email?
Same inbox, same person, same answer. Attachments, specifications and RFP documents are welcome — and email works whether or not the form above is connected.
Write to contact@wecsharp.com. It is the only address we publish, it reaches a senior engineer, and there is nothing between you and the reply.
What happens next
What happens to what you send
-
A person reads it
Whether you use the form or email us directly, your message lands in the inbox a senior engineer reads. There is no routing, no qualification queue and no autoresponder in front of it. We reply personally.
-
A short scoping call, if it looks like a fit
A call about the outcome you need, the constraints that govern it, the regulatory context, and the deadline. No deck, and no discovery workshop to buy first.
-
A straight answer
You get our view on the approach and the shape of the work — and on whether we are the right people for it — before any commitment. If we are not, we will say so.
Message quality
What to include
None of this is required — a paragraph is a fine start. But the more of it you can give us, the more useful the first reply will be.
- The outcome you need. What has to be true when this is finished, described as a result rather than as a feature list.
- The stack you already run. The systems this has to live alongside — EDC, CTMS, document management, identity, finance — and who owns them.
- The regulatory context. HIPAA, GxP, 21 CFR Part 11, or none of the above. It changes the design, not just the paperwork.
- Constraints and deadlines. The audit, the study start, the contract renewal, or the process nobody is allowed to change.
- Who signs off. The person or function that has to accept the result — quality, regulatory, IT security, or the budget holder.